Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Boys Are Also Responsible

Photo from the "Purity Ball" courtesy of the New York Times

The New York Times had a really fascinating piece about a tradition of father-daughter "Purity Balls" that has emerged in Colorado that promote abstinence from sex before marriage. Check it out:

"COLORADO SPRINGS — In their floor-length gowns, up-dos and tiaras, the 70 or so young women swept past two harpists and into a gilt-and-brocade dining room at the lavish Broadmoor Hotel, on the arms of their much older male companions.

At a hotel in Colorado Springs, Courtney McAlpin, 14, of Minneapolis, listened as her father, Steve, read a pledge in which he vowed to follow evangelical ideals to protect her purity.

The girls, ages early grade school to college, had come with their fathers, stepfathers and future fathers-in-law last Friday night to the ninth annual Father-Daughter Purity Ball. The first two hours of the gala passed like any somewhat awkward night out with parents, the men doing nearly all the talking and the girls struggling to cut their chicken.

But after dessert, the 63 men stood and read aloud a covenant “before God to cover my daughter as her authority and protection in the area of purity.”

The gesture signaled that the fathers would guard their daughters from what evangelicals consider a profoundly corrosive “hook-up culture.” The evening, which alternated between homemade Christian rituals and giddy dancing, was a joyous public affirmation of the girls’ sexual abstinence until they wed.

Yet the graying men in the shadow of their glittering daughters were the true focus of the night. To ensure their daughters’ purity, they were asked to set an example and to hew to evangelical ideals in a society they say tempts them as much as it does their daughters.

“It’s also good for me,” said Terry Lee, 54, who attended the ball for a second year, this time with his youngest daughter, Rachel, 16. “It inspires me to be spiritual and moral in turn. If I’m holding them to such high standards, you can be sure I won’t be cheating on their mother.” Read the whole article here.

I had mixed feelings about this piece. On the one hand I always feel an affinity for people who are trying to live according to high moral standards when it comes to sexuality. This is truly a counter-cultural exercise in the United States where there is much talk about sexual "freedom" and "choice" but (in my experience) little respect for those who choose not to have sex. Whenever I hear efforts such as the one in Colorado spoken of in the media, the journalists and pundits can hardly disguise their horror and contempt (This article is an exception). That so many attempt to present their lack of faith in the ability of young people (or anyone else for that matter) to control their sexual behavior as a form of "enlightenment" or "science" is one of the bitter ironies of the period in which we are living.

However, as someone who is about welcome a son into the world, I found myself wondering why this group in Colorado isn't also having these kinds of events for mothers and sons, or fathers and sons for that matter (I don't know how many sons would dance with their dads, but who knows?!) The tendency to focus on girls when addressing what will or will not happen sexually represents an imbalance in the approach to this issue. Boys have just as much responsibility for what does or does not happen sexually as girls do. I believe this is something our sons must be raised to appreciate. So often there is this "boys will be boys" kind of attitude and the burden for keeping the clothes on is placed on girls. I recently overheard some people talking about the problem of teenage girls getting pregnant. This went on and on. I finally pointed out that the folks were speaking as if the boys involved (and sometimes men frankly) didn't event exist, like these girls got pregnant spontaneously. They got this look of shock on their faces and then an "oh yeah" expression. All their moral outrage was focused on the girls, "she shoulda done this", "she shouldn't have done that." This is not helpful to our daughters or our sons. Healthy sexuality requires a partnership of equal responsibility. We need to make sure our boys are prepared for it.

"Make ye then a mighty effort, that...for purity, immaculacy, refinement, and the preservation of health, they shall be leaders in the vanguard of those who know. And that by their freedom from enslavement, their knowledge, their self-control, they shall be first among the pure, the free and the wise."
(Abdu'l-Baha, Selections from the Writings of Abdu'l-Baha, p. 150)

4 comments:

Los Angelista said...

Amen!!! I always wonder what about the boys, too! I think so much about how there's zero expectation that a man will remain a virgin till marriage and if he does, he's a punk. I worry about this a lot with my sons because to be black and male means added societal pressure since they're supposed to be these highly sexed "pimps".

Phillipe Copeland said...

Liz this issue of the sexualization of young black males is really important. In general a find that the expectations for young black men regarding sexual ethics are even lower than for young people in general. It has very real consequences for both black men and black women (ie, the alarming rates of HIV/AIDS among black women!) You are truly a parental warrior Liz in a society like ours you don't have a choice.

Phillipe Copeland said...

posted on behalf of Phyllis

Bravo, Phillipe. Indeed -- healthy sexuality -- and happy relationship in general -- really does require that kind of partnership of equal responsibility. The young men I know who abide by this also seem to demonstrate that real nobility is less about protecting someone else than it is about developing your own capacity for self-restraint. In addition, it would sure be nice to hear some more men (of all ages, and not just dads) turning that going-to-battle energy toward vanquishing the mass objectification of women that assaults us from every medium. Thanks for this highly thoughtful reflection.

Victor Kulkosky said...

It's especially interesting that this Christian event was between fathers and daughters. In New Testament Jesus said: "If a man looks upon a woman with lust, he has already commited adultery with her in his heart." There is no equivalent line for women. The burden is on the man. Yet men continue to blame women for sexual indiscretions: "She was just so hot!" "The b@#$% wanted it!" "If she didn't want to do it, she shouldn't have dressed like that." Jesus, for one, said otherwise. The story of the Woman Taken in Adultery, in which Jesus utters the famous line, "Let he among you who is without sin be the first to cast a stone at her," also places on the onus on the men and forgives the woman. Jesus refuses to condemn her.

I think there are also clear class issues in this Purity Ball. The fancy gowns and the emphasis on chastity until marriage and the father/daughter emphasis point to the political economy of marriage, in which female chastity has high socio-economic value, but male chastity does not. If we dig deeper, we will probably find racial issues involved as well, since the burden of racial "purity" also falls on the woman. If gambling were permitted us, I'd bet money the event in this story was lily white. Race, class and gender -- the often unholy trinity.
Victor