
The color-blind vs. color-conscious debate continues in America. This time its about so called "transracial" adoptions. This from the New York Times:
WASHINGTON — Minority children in foster care are being ill-served by a federal law that plays down race and culture in adoptions, a report released on Tuesday said.
The report, based on an examination of the law’s impact over a decade, said that minority children adopted into white households face special challenges and that white parents need preparation and training for what might lie ahead.
But it found that social workers and state agencies fear litigation and stiff penalties under the law for even discussing race with adopting couples. As a result, families often do not get the counseling they need. It also found that states have ignored an aspect of the law that requires diligent recruitment of black parents.
The report recommends that the law — the Multiethnic Placement Act, which covers agencies receiving federal dollars and promotes a color-blind approach — be amended to permit agencies to consider race and culture as one of many factors when selecting parents for children from foster care.
The report was issued by the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute, a nonprofit adoption advocacy and research organization based in New York. Several child welfare organizations — including the Child Welfare League of America, the Adoption Exchange Association, the National Association of Black Social Workers, Voice for Adoption and the Foster Care Alumni of America — have endorsed the report.
The report points out that transracial adoption itself does not produce psychological or other social problems in children, but that these children often face major challenges as the only person of color in an all-white environment, trying to cope with being different.
“The idea of being color-blind is great, and we’d all like to get there,” said Adam Pertman, executive director of the Adoption Institute. “But the reality is that we live in a very race-conscious society, and that needs to be addressed. We can’t simply pretend that the problem doesn’t exist and leave it up to the child to cope.”
Many transracial adoptees say they struggle to fit in among their own family members. Shannon Gibney, 33, a writer in Minneapolis who describes herself as biracial, was adopted by a white couple who tried their best by providing things like books by black authors.
“But having books and other things about blacks is no substitute for actual experience,” Ms. Gibney said. “When I had questions about even little things like how to wear my hair, there was no one around to help me with my questions.” (This article is a MUST READ)
I've recently become a fan of the excellent blog "Anti-Racist Parent" which I learned about through Los Angelista (another must read). One of the recent posts involves a white couple who chose to adopt a black baby girl:
"As an adoptee, I had prepared myself for all of the unknowingly hurtful things people can say and do when asking about the adoption. I knew the comments and “looks” would be very frequent since Gracie is obviously a different race the rest of the family. However, quite a few of the reactions and comments dealt mostly with the difference in race than our adoption. There is never a time that I don’t feel more like the parent of a little black daughter then when I’m out and about running errands. I have been called “the babysitter” more times then I can count. I believe that the reaction to verbally address me as “the babysitter” comes more from the idea that people do not like to encounter things that they do not understand then from the fact I’m so young looking. To place me in the babysitter box, it allows them to categorize me without looking further.
I have been stopped numerous times to be consulted on what I should be doing with my daughter’s hair. I personally think her hair looks great and that I do a kick ass job, however it seems that a lot of women feel otherwise. I am constantly stopped, in the middle of the store, and told exactly how I am failing as her hairdresser. I have been given thousands of names of products and devices to make her hair straighter, fuller, grow faster and be more manageable. My daughter is only 18 months old people, give me a break! When I need the help I ask for it and I tend to ask people that I know, not strangers at the store.
Since we adopted Gracie we have seen a dramatic transformation in our family. It’s amazing what holding a sweet infant in your arms can do to some of the deep-rooted racism that is taught and sometimes passed down unknowingly to future generations.
We have a large extended family. There are some who had trouble relating to Gracie or understanding why we would adopt outside of our race. In an attempt to give the impression that they were not bothered by her race, some family members have mentioned physical qualities about her that are stereotypically African American. They say, “she’s going to have a big butt, I can already see it” or “her hair is going to be a problem, what are you going to do?” Some relatives even told us that they would not love Gracie as much as Porter and then tell us it has nothing to do with race." (Read the whole thing here)For a different twist on the transracial adoption debate I recommend that you read another post from Anti-Racist Parent called "Half-price adoptions: Should we tell our kids?"
Anyone who reads this blog knows that I'm no fan of color-blind approaches to race. As I've said before God loves color and so do I. On the other hand, I've often said that love of one's physical features (that are racialized in our society) and ethnic/cultural background is transmitted through the heart and not through the skin. Simply having parents and kids with the same skin color does not represent an antidote to internalized racism or guarantee of ethnic pride. I've learned that through bitter personal experience.
For me these articles and posts about transracial adoption actually raise a related but perhaps deeper question: To what degree are parents of any race raising their children in such a way that they will have a healthy love of themselves and the desire and skills to work effectively for racial justice and unity in America? Whites who adopt children of color are an easy target for criticism, but it implies that parents raising kids in more traditional racially homogeneous families are doing just fine relative to this question. If we are honest with ourselves, I think we'll acknowledge that that is a pretty big assumption.
Present and future parents I want to hear from you. What do you think about transracial adoptions? What do you think about parenting with the explicit goal of promoting racial unity and justice?
I'll close with this prayer which has become a favorite of mine as an expectant father:
"O Thou kind Lord! These lovely children are the handiwork of the fingers of Thy might and the wondrous signs of Thy greatness. O God! Protect these children, graciously assist them to be educated and enable them to render service to the world of humanity. O God! These children are pearls, cause them to be nurtured within the shell of Thy loving-kindness.
Thou art the Bountiful, the All-Loving."
- 'Abdu'l-Bahá






As always your blogs are beautiful. When I was in law school, which now seems like a lifetime ago, I read a book by the famous Harvard Prof. Randell Kennedy it was named "INTERRACIAL INTIMACIES" and it was a study love and relationships among ethnic groups. I don't know if the book focused primarily on adoption of "other race children" or it was just the part that stuck out at me. The book mostly reported the challenges and problems of "interracial" adoption except for one story about a Baha'i girl...I think her last name was Goff (or something like that). And she says what a terrific experience it was to be adopted by this white family who are Baha'i. Even though she is black with white parents she reported that because the Baha'i community is made of people of all colors from all countries and that it was like an extended family she never felt out. Also she had Bahai family members who could assists her to understand her background effectively. Anyway, this is all from memory and I wish I had the book with me now so I could share it because the actual text was very moving, and contrary to every other experience reported in the book. That's all I have to say about that~ Artemis
ReplyDeleteArtemis, I'm family with Randall Kennedy's work, he's an interesting brother for sure. I haven't read the book but it's probably worth a read. Thanks for being the first to jump in here with a comment.
ReplyDeleteKeep those comments coming people.
Phillipe, I had a big long rambling post written out about reading Anti-Racist Parent and Bell Hooks, my family history in Africa, and the potential for adopting a Black girl into our family. I reread it and decided it just didn't work as a comment on a blog. I might make it into a full article or two or three for my blog. Instead, here's a comment that fits your post.
ReplyDelete"To what degree are parents of any race raising their children in such a way that they will have a healthy love of themselves and the desire and skills to work effectively for racial justice and unity in America? "
My wife and I are convinced, as are my two daughters, that what makes you beautiful (or, heaven forbid, 'cute') isn't your skin tone, hair color or bone configuration, it's being happy, kind, adventurous, friendly and loving. I believe this is what Baha'u'llah and `Abdu'l-Baha teach. I am very proud of my daughters, especially of their sense of justice.
yours,
Jeff
In addition to what's been said, I also think thatwhen examining whether policy/legislation is going to have a good result, a bad result, or make little difference we should know something about the socio/economic/political forces and history driving such decisions. Here is a little background (as I understand it, and with apologies for being very loose on dates:)
ReplyDeleteFirst, some attention should be given to the fact that in this country we have a two tiered system of adoption. In many ways it parallels our two tiered systems of health care and education: Children who are adopted through private agencies are adopted mainly by middle-class parents, one reason being the fees--which in the case of international adoptions are even more substantial-- Children in foster care, "wards of the state", are by and large adopted by poor, unemployed or working-class poor, families; those in care in urban areas are mostly minorities, largely African-American.
At one time,--till sometime in early 1960's, I think, regardless of the source of the adoption, most children of any "race" were adopted by white, middle-class, two-parent families. African American children were often removed from African American foster homes where they were being cared for, for the purpose of such adoptions.
Subsequent, major legislation and policy changes, with the support (largely spearheaded by? I am not sure) of the National Association of Black Social Workers, were all designed to remedy the situation by changing the criteria for adoption:
1. Mandated in-race-placement, and in-race adoption, in all but unusual cases.
2. Adoption subsidies--monthly, non-taxable payments to adopting parent(s) which continue after adoption until a child is no longer legally dependent; three ascending subsidy rates, determined by whether a child is "normal", or has a diagnosed physical, learning or emotional disability, and the severity of the handicap.
3. A single parent may adopt; age is not a barrier if the person is in good health.
4. Strengthening of kinship adoption, where a relative adopts a child, with subsidy. Age and other qualifications even less of a barrier.
5.In the 1990's, nother change,in policy if not always in practice, took place in NYC where I worked. I'm not sure about other places:
NYC Child Welfare Agency's official policy became placing siblings in foster care with at least the same agency, preferably in the same home, and attempting to have those who did not return to their family adopted together. Interestingly, Malcolm X's brother, then-Commissioner Little, was the person who established this policy in NYC; he cited as a driving force behind his committment his own family having been largely destroyed by the separation of siblings, something Malcolm X also spoke on in his biography (by Alex Haley).
Part of the the NABSW committment to in-race-placement was a belief that the adoption of large numbers of African American children --overrepresented in the foster care system to begin with -- by white middle class families was effectivly removing a lot of the next generation from the African American community, thereby weakening the African American community as a whole.
Then, in the late '90's came legislation--it has been around for a while, if not actively enforced -- doing away with in-race placement. Race was to be considered "only one factor" in determining the suitability of an adoptive home. It was connected with governments on the national, state and local levels attempting to shrink the foster care system and speed adoptions of children in care. This legislation has affected private sector adoptions as well.
My opinions:
--Adoption should truly be in the "best interests of the child", not driven by the needs of the adopting parents, the agency, or the political agendas or economic/political aims of any group. In the private sector, since the parent pays a fee, the parent's needs come first; there are also often abuses by agencies collecting fees, especially in international adoptions. In the public sector, with all of the back and forth changes I've seen, heard about, and was a part of, I still don't think the focus, overall, is the optimal well-being child.
I say this with hesitancy because I've also known many wonderful and unsung heros, both those who have adopted by whatever method, and those who have worked within yet another "lamentably defective" system. And a significant number of adoptions with positive outcomes. But I still would say that, in general, public adoption, which I know best, is a second-rate system "serving" poor, largely minority, families, that cries out for help.
--The push to get children in foster care adopted more swiftly has led to many less than optimal adoptions.
--Adoption subsidies, while wonderful in theory, have also led to a lot of abuse. Adopting more children and adopting "handicapped" children provides greater income. This can make a cricial difference in lifestyle for a poor person. Which can be good, but only when such changes benefit the child.
-- Keeping a child in the community from which he or she comes has had a downside. It has led to many, many children being adopted by families struggling, not always successfully, within the same economic, educational and social ills that brought the child into foster care in the first place. I don't think statistics
about the "survival" rate of these adoptees, if indeed anyone will bother to collect them, will look good. By "survival" I mean, for example: not getting killed, not succumbing to addiction, staying healthy, staying out of prison, getting an education, not becoming addicted, becoming employed, and in general leading a functional life. Again, there are many notable exceptions.
But maybe racial identity issues pale before these stark realities?
--I wish more middle-class African American families would adopt African American children, and, for those who do adopt, that they would do so through the public rather than private system.
--I don't think most white people are equipped to deal with the racial issues African American children are bound to face to greater or lesser degree--how could they,(we) when they (we) have not experienced growing up Black in America? I am including here many Baha'i parents. This lack or huge blind spot can foster a disconnect between parent and child, especially during the teenage years, a crucial time in one's life. Training for adopting parents is good, but beyond training the adopting parent needs not a "color-blind" attitude, but heart-to-heart contact, serious discussions with intimate friends who are African American, and from all walks of life, not just those in their own socio-economic group, or even their religion. How many people are willing to undertake this? I have seen some tragic results without it.
-- Footnote: Apparently we white mothers of African American children might, by some miracle, pass all the other criteria, but,unanimously from all my African-American friends and family, we do need to learn about hair! (My daughter and I joked about all that in comments on this blog a looong time ago).
So many words, and I haven't provided any answers. Guess I don't think there are any easy answers, just a lot of sometimes painful reality to ponder with an open and spiritual mind.
My hope and wish (as a grandparent, now) is that parents will, indeed, realize the challenge of what they undertake, gain a deeper understanding of themselves and the issues surrounding all adoption, especially when it is trans-racial adoption, and raise the children of the future envisioned by the Master.
Judith W.
Judith, do you know of any discussion forums for Baha'i Adoptive Parents?
ReplyDeleteAnd on the subject of hair, my wife is white but raised in Malawi, so I'm pretty sure she "gets" African hair... ;) That was not one of our worries.
I appreciated the comment from the mother interviewed in the NPR story yesterday who moved to a new neighborhood after adopting. Heck, I'm ready to do that now, regardless of adoptions. And it's pretty much guaranteed that we'll move back to Africa, Malawi or Tanzania probably, after my wife finishes her Masters degree.
I know I have a lot to learn, both about adoption procedures in the US and race and friendship, but I am working on it.
Such a complex subject for which I offer some random thoughts.
ReplyDeleteOne item rarely mentioned in adoptions is the motivation of the adoptive parents. One elderly couple I knew had foster-parented a dozen children once their own had left the nest. These were wonderful parents but whenever they tried to adopt one of the foster children, they were denied because their income was insufficient.
Conversely, many couples spend their reproductive years amassing wealth (homes, cars, boat, etc.) and then find themselves unable to get that last toy - the badge of completeness - a child of their own. One wonders how any child of any color will fare in such an environment.
I see no problem with trans-race adoption; so long as the motives for adoption are pure. Back in the '70s First Nation children were greatly sought after by white couples. The "sales" were appalling.
IMO, too much emphasis on the child's difference in color/culture is almost as bad as ignoring it. I am the product of a multi-racial/cultural marriage. My mother "passed" her entire adult life and made sure that we, her children, could pass. How we looked with envy on our cousins - on those few occasions we were permitted to see them - for though we as "Anglos" had material advantages, they had all the fun :) They were comfortable in the warmth of their culture.
With warm Baha'i regards,
Reed
Jeff,
ReplyDeleteI don't know of such forums, but they may be out there. Great idea!
Maybe you would like to start one yourself?
One of the still-not-started projects I had in mind when I retired a few years ago was to write some kind of book on "issues of adoption", from adult adoptees point of view, very anecdotal, using true stories that span the spectrum from sad to inspiring.
It would mainly be for parents starting out down that road, "consciousness raising", as we used to say in the '60's. Your comments and query may push me to pursue this effort. Thanks.
I hope my previous long comments did not come across as discouraging to you, it was not my intention. I just think it is important not to close one's eyes when crossing a street with trafffic.
Your humble, prayerful confidence, combined with a thoughtful, consultative approach to applying all of the Writings available on parenting in general and your reaching out to others will no doubt continue to confirm your efforts and enable you and your wife to raise the kind of children the world needs.
I know thatI have seen a lot of my own efforts come to fruiton. About Malawi I know nothing. But I suspect there are racial issues, perhaps in a different form, to grapple with there as well.
Very best wishes
Judith W.
Reed,
ReplyDeleteYour story would, I am sure, interest me.
The whole history and subject of "passing" has been and remains controversial, often divisive, when spoken of at all.
So I am interested in your perspective, especially as a Baha'i.
If you don't find the questions too presumptuous: During what time period were you raised? And, in retrospect, do you think your mother, by choosing to "pass", and imparting to her children that this was an option open to them, was paying too much or too little attention to color? Or anything else you think is relevant?
Judith W.
The full report from the NY Times article is available here:
ReplyDeleteAfrican American Adoption and the Role of Race and Law in Adoption
Negin and I have definitely considered transracial adoption. I am in favor of finding good homes for Black children, and strongly believe this requires honesty about the white supremacist nature of our country.
Phillipe - thank you for reframing the larger question. I wish I could speak to concrete suggestions for parents to generate healthy self love and skills for justice and unity in their kids. (Another reason to frequent Anti-Racist Parent.) I suspect it requires truthfulness about the continuing history of racism, and unity with other souls in the community who can provide knowledge and suggestions the parents would be unaware of. (Humility probably plays a big role as well.)
Everyone's comments have been so insightful. Judith - thank you for the history, and for breaking down the two-tier public/private system. It was incredibly helpful for my own understanding.
The legalization of colorblindness stuff is terrifying (esp. demonstrated by the stats at the end of the article): "...social workers and state agencies fear litigation and stiff penalties under the law for even discussing race with adopting couples."
While it has often been socially taboo to discuss race directly, that taboo is more and more being codified into policy and legislation. Mentioning race in these dealings becomes a PUNISHABLE offense: $1.8 million in fines to Ohio social workers for requiring that the parents "prepare a plan to address the child's cultural needs and to evaluate the racial demographics of their neighborhood." It was deemed 'discrimination' -- discrimination against whom?!! I pray to God that if Negin and I are part of a transracial adoption, we put at LEAST that much consideration into our actions. I have too much of an internalized, unconscious sense of racial superiority to NOT engage in that kind of due diligence.
The report suggests some policy band-aids, some of which dovetail with Judith's comments: Put some teeth behind the requirement that states "vigorously recruit black adoptive parents," and make sure that legislation, far from punishing the behavior, actively requires the consideration of race and "the preparation of parents adopting transracially."
Thanks Jeff, Artemis, Judith, Lev and anyone else who has commented on this complex issue. I hope others will be so inspired and generous with their thoughts. Lev, I think you and Negin would make awesome transracial adoptive parents, you have my full support!
ReplyDeleteHope you'll all weigh in on the next topic I just posted today.